RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
CASE NUMBER: PD1200938 SEPARATION DATE: 20030430
BOARD DATE: 20130129
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (54B/Chemical Operations Specialist),
medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP) due to multi-level degenerative disc disease
(DDD) of the lumbosacral spine. He did not improve adequately with treatment and was unable
to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical
fitness standards. He was issued a L3 Profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board
(MEB). Plantar fasciitis, retropatellar pain syndrome (RPPS), obesity and meralgia paresthetica
conditions, identified in the rating chart below, were also identified and forwarded by the MEB.
The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the chronic LBP condition as unfitting, rated
10% with likely application of US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The
remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting or not ratable (in the case of
obesity). The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 10% disability rating.
CI CONTENTION: My medical condition has gotten worse and am becoming limited to daily
activities.
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the
CI, those condition(s) identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB. The ratings
for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The rated condition chronic LBP due to
multi-level DDD of the lumbosacral spine is the only condition that meets the criteria prescribed
in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview; and, is addressed below. Any conditions or contention not
requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Boards defined scope of review, remain
eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
Service PEB Dated 20030114
VA (1 Mo. Pre-Separation) All Effective Date 20030501
Condition
Code
Rating
Condition
Code
Rating
Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain
5295
10%
Lumbar Spine Degen. Disc Dis.
5293-5292
40%
20030401
Retropatellar Pain Syndrome
Not Unfitting
Lt Knee Retropatellar Pain
5099-5014
10%
20030401
Rt Knee Retropatellar Pain
5099-5014
10%
20030401
Plantar Fasciitis
Not Unfitting
Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis
5299-5276
10%
20030401
Meralgia Paresthetica
Not Unfitting
NO VA ENTRY
Obesity
Not a Ratable
Condition
NO VA ENTRY
.No Additional MEB/PEB Entries.
0% X 1
Combined: 10%
Combined: 60%
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:
Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Multi-level Degenerative Disc Disease of the Lumbosacral Spine
Condition. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM), dictated 28 August 2002, noted chronic
intermittent LBP since a motorcycle accident in 1998 and aggravated by a subsequent motor
vehicle accident in January 2001. He returned to duty but continued to complain of back pain
aggravated by standing, walking, repeated bending, running and heavy lifting. Computed axial
tomography (CAT) scan in December 2002 demonstrated multilevel degenerative lumbar disc
disease with disc protrusion at several levels but no herniation. Conservative treatment was
not helpful however surgery treatment was not considered necessary. An assessment on
27 March 2002 noted chronic pain with a normal examination including flexion and gait. A
physical therapy evaluation on 19 August 2002 noted painful motion with moderately limited
motion (flexion 40 degrees, extension 10 degrees, lateral flexion 20 degrees both sides, and
rotation 20 degrees both sides). Gait, posture, muscle strength and reflexes were normal. An
orthopedic examination performed on 28 August 2002 also noted normal gait, passive flexion
of 90 degrees and extension of 20 degrees. The MEB physical examination on 30 October 2002
(DD Form 2808) recorded diffuse tenderness to pressure on the thoracolumbar spine region, no
muscle spasms or deformity. Range -of-motion (ROM) was moderately limited by pain (flexion
45 degrees, extension 20 degrees, lateral flexion 25 degrees both sides). Leg raising increased
back pain without radicular symptoms. Reflexes were intact. Neurological examination was
normal except for decreased sensation in the outer right thigh consistent with a possible L4
nerve root dysfunction versus meralgia paresthetica (lateral femoral cutaneous nerve
compression at the waist unrelated to back condition). The MEB NARSUM dated 20 December
2002 cited the October 2002 MEB examination. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P)
examination, performed on 1 April 2003, a month prior to separation, the exam of the lumbar
spine revealed no asymmetry, deformity or focal tenderness or muscle spasms. Gait was
normal. ROM was limited to 30 degrees flexion, 20 degrees extension, 15 degrees lateral
flexion bilaterally. Pain was reported with all directions of motion. Lower extremity muscle
strength and reflexes were normal.
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. In
accordance with DoDI 6040.44, the Board is required to recommend a rating IAW the VASRD in
effect at the time of separation. The Board notes that the 2002 Veteran Administration
Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards for the spine, which were in effect at the
time of separation, were changed to the current §4.71a rating standards in 2004. The Board
must correlate the above clinical data with the 2003 rating schedule (applicable diagnostic
codes include: 5292 limitation of lumbar spine motion; 5293 intervertebral disc syndrome; 5295
lumbosacral strain). The PEB rated the CIs back pain condition at 10%, coded 5295
(lumbosacral strain) citing pain with motion without spasm (but also noted moderate limitation
of motion). The VA rated the back condition 40% (coded 5293-5292) citing severe limitation of
motion at the time of the C&P examination. The Board considered the rating under the VASRD
diagnostic code 5292, limitation of lumbar motion. The Board agreed that the ROM
documented at the time of the MEB examination supported the 20% rating, moderate, under
the VASRD diagnostic code 5292. The Board noted the worsened ROM at the time of the C&P
examination; however it was not consistent with previous examinations or the absence of
spasm, and was otherwise unexplained by any cause for worsening. The CI had a chronic
condition, and the preponderance of evidence more nearly approximated the moderate
limitation than the severe. The Board next considered whether a higher rating was warranted
under the guidelines for intervertebral syndrome, code 5293, however there were no
incapacitating episodes to support a minimum rating under this code. The Board also
considered the rating under the code, 5295, lumbosacral strain but concluded the
preponderance of evidence did not support a rating higher that the 10% rating assigned by the
PEB. There was characteristic pain on motion but no muscle spasm, or unilateral loss of lateral
motion, or evidence of severe strain with listing or marked limitation of motion. There was no
evidence of ratable peripheral nerve impairment which would provide for additional or higher
rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3
(reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the chronic LBP
condition coded 5292.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the
chronic LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20% coded
5292 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Boards scope of review
for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CIs prior determination be modified as
follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:
UNFITTING CONDITION
VASRD CODE
RATING
Chronic Low Back Pain
5293-5292
20%
COMBINED
20%
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120604, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
Acting Director
Physical Disability Board of Review
SFMR-RB
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / XXXXXXXXXX), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20130003831 (PD201200938)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of
Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the
subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a,
I accept the Boards recommendation to modify the individuals disability rating to 20%
without recharacterization of the individuals separation. This decision is final.
2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be
corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.
3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided
to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have
shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this
memorandum without enclosures.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00708
The PEB rated the condition 10% based on pain on forward motion under the 5295 code for lumbosacral strain. The VA reported 90 degrees of lumbar forward flexion and ROMs were consistent with near-normal ROMs from the AMA guidelines in effect at the time, and the Board adjudged these as slight limitation (IAW 5292, Spine, limitation of lumbar motion). Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF Director Physical Disability...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01020
Post-Separation) All Effective Date 20020906 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic Low Back Pain w/out Neurologic Abnormality 5299-5295 10% Lower Back Condition with Bulging Disc at L4/L5 and Radiculopathy 5293 20% 20021010 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. The 2002 Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine, which were in effect at the time of separation, were changed in late September 2002 regarding...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00117
Spine surgery evaluation concluded there was no indication for surgery.The MEB physical examination on29January 2002 (DD Form 2808) recorded “ROM 45 degrees anterior flexion” but did not specify whether this was lumbar spine or trunk motion.The orthopedic MEB narrative summary addendum examination on30March 2002, recorded back flexion with fingers reaching to mid shin (approximately 70 degrees), similar to the physical therapy examination the year previously.There was tenderness to palpation...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01541
The chronic LBP condition, characterized as mechanical low back pain was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Post-Separation) Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic Low Back Pain 5299-5295 10% Spondylosis of the Lumbosacral Spine 5295 10% 20020226 No Additional MEB/PEB Entries Other x N/A Combined: 10% Combined: 10% ANALYSIS SUMMARY: Chronic Low Back Pain Condition: The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM), dated 03 May 2001, 5 months prior to...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01318
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1201318 SEPARATION DATE: 20011006 BOARD DATE: 20130305 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (92Y/Supply Specialist), medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. After...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01336
Pre -Separation) All Effective Date 20030416 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Back Pain & Loss of Motion 5293-5299- 5292 20% S/p Laminectomy L4-5, L5-S1 5293-5292 40% 20030205 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. At the MEB exam, the NARSUM, 24 October 2002, noted gradual improvement of pain, but with persistent difficulties with bending, stooping, lifting and running. The MEB physical exam noted that the general physical examination is within normal limits. The NARSUM...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00857
Lumbar spine X‐rays 25 October 2002 were normal including normal intervertebral disc spaces. The VA rated 40% citing limitation of motion at the time of the C&P examinations over a year after separation (coded 5293‐5292). Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF President Physical Disability Board of Review SFMR‐RB MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency (TAPD‐ZB / XXXXXXXX), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00881
5299-5295Chronic Low Back Pain, Myofascial5010-529220%20030203 An urgent care treatment note dated 21 September 2001 (6 months prior to separation) noted muscle spasm, with significantly increased pain and “60% of expected range of motion.” On 1October 2001, his commander endorsed that the CI was not fit for continued service due to the duty limitations secondary to his back injury.At the MEB exam, 3 months prior to separation, the CI reported pain in the right lower lumbar region,...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01270
The low back condition was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501 and no other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated the mechanical low back pain (LBP)as unfitting, rated 10%.The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated. There is insufficient evidence to support the higher rating of 20% since there is no evidence of spasms occurring on extreme forward bending and no documented clinical evidence of spasms in any record prior to...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01023
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1201023 SEPARATION DATE: 20020814 BOARD DATE: 20130124 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (13B/Canon Crewmember), medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP) secondary to spondylolysis at L-3 without neurologic abnormality. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore,...